HLPlanet is an independent publication focused on honest, in-depth reviews of PC peripherals – from mechanical keyboards and gaming controllers to the gear we simply find worth talking about. HLPlanet was founded in 2016.
We cut through the marketing noise to bring you practical, real-world insights. Our reviews are based on firsthand experience, and our goal is to help readers make better buying decisions – especially when it comes to lesser-known but high-quality tech from emerging brands.
What We Do
- We review mechanical keyboards, gaming mice, controllers, and related peripherals
- We cover both well-known and niche brands, with a special interest in high-value products from China
- We test gear thoroughly, write clearly, and take our own original photos and videos
- We maintain an independent voice, free from sponsor influence or affiliate bias
- We attend tech conferences such as CES, IFA Berlin and Mobile World Congress to check out the newest devices firsthand.
Whether you’re looking for a lightweight mouse for FPS games, a budget-friendly 65% keyboard or a unique controller for mobile gaming – we’ve likely tested something similar.
Our Mission
We believe great tech isn’t always mainstream.
Our mission is to highlight products that are:
- Well-designed and well-built, even if they’re not backed by big brands
- Affordable without compromise
- Underrepresented in the Western media space
We give these products the same attention and scrutiny we’d give to high-end gear.
How We Test Hardware at HLPlanet
Data-Driven and Hands-On Testing
HLPlanet applies a consistent, structured testing methodology to all hardware we review. For keyboards, controllers, and related peripherals, we combine objective measurements with extended real-world usage to produce comprehensive data sets for each product. Our testing includes measurable performance metrics such as input latency (using devices like OSLTT), actuation accuracy, polling rate behavior, wireless responsiveness, build quality indicators, and software stability where applicable. These data points are recorded systematically so that comparisons across devices are meaningful and objective.
We do not rely solely on manufacturer specs or marketing claims. Instead, every significant metric is verified through direct measurement and usage scenarios such as competitive gaming tests (e.g., latency impact in FPS titles) or long-term reliability assessments of the tested devices by our editorial team.
Objective Measurement and Benchmarks
Depending on the product category, we employ the following benchmarks:
- Latency Testing – Quantifying actual response times under real operating conditions rather than relying on advertised polling rates. We use OSLTT and GPDL. This helps distinguish devices with true performance advantages.
- Actuation and Sensor Accuracy – For keyboards with advanced switches (Hall Effect or TMR), we log actuation distances and consistency across keystrokes to assess precision.
- Software and Feature Validation – We inspect configuration software for feature completeness, stability, and real utility rather than flashy UIs alone.
- Build and Ergonomics – Structural robustness, material quality, and ergonomic considerations are recorded through extended use.
These objective measurements anchor our scoring frameworks and enable direct product comparisons where appropriate.
Structured Subjective Evaluation
Where quantifiable data cannot fully capture the user experience — such as typing feel, controller stick ergonomics, or audio-tactile feedback — we apply a clearly defined subjective assessment scale. This scale is consistent across reviews and grounded in specific descriptors rather than vague impressions. Each subjective score is linked to criteria such as long-session comfort, sound profile clarity, or ease of configuration.
Transparent and Reproducible Scoring
Our scoring methodology is documented in every review and comparison article so readers can understand how final scores and recommendations were derived. Where we compile a “best of” list, each choice is justified with reference to these documented scores and clearly defined selection criteria. Scores are data-centric and consistent, allowing readers to see why one device outperforms another.
Independence from Paid Influence
HLPlanet does not accept payment in exchange for higher scores or preferential placement in comparison guides. Any affiliate relationships or discount codes are disclosed separately and do not influence scoring or editorial conclusions. Readers can verify that our reviews are based on testing outcomes and defined metrics rather than external commercial factors.
Real-World Context and Use Cases
Testing is not confined to lab conditions. We expose products to real-world user scenarios, such as extended gaming sessions, daily workflow use, and varied environmental conditions typical for the target audience of gamers and tech enthusiasts. These conditions often reveal performance characteristics not apparent in isolated measurements.
Social media
- HLplanet on Facebook
- HLplanet on Pinterest
- HLplanet on Youtube
- HLplanet on Medium
- HLplanet on Spoutible
- Marcus on Twitter
Contact Us
Have a question, suggestion, or product you’d like us to review?
The best way to reach us is through our Contact Form, where you’ll also find our direct email. For quicker replies, feel free to DM Marcus via Twitter/X.
We’re always open to partnerships, press inquiries, or simply hearing from readers.